5 ms·

Ask HN: Best way for a small (3 person) team to collaborate with source code?

22 points by billclerico 17y ago

SVN seems a little too overbearing just yet - any clever solutions with dropbox or the like?

Dobbs 17y ago
Look up git.
Zarathu 17y ago
Github.com I'd use it for a 2-person team. It's incredible. (No. Use a repository.)
davidmathers 17y ago
github
- apsurd 17y ago
  +1 to github. Yes you can use git for free if you know how to set it up, but for $12/month in your case ($7 in mine), I just like the convenience of having someone else continually worry and work on all that stuff. It's also important to think like an entrepreneur. Focus on what you are good at, delegate everything else to people good at those things. Git specifically: I knew absolutely nothing about version control when I started looking into it. (about a month ago). My project will soon be open source so i know I needed to start thinking in terms of version control. I picked git over svn very simply because git was made by Linus. Git seems (to me) to have a better quality following as of now. I like being in the best company (it's bound to rub off). This tutorial was/is very helpful to me: http://hoth.entp.com/output/git_for_designers.html http://hoth.entp.com/output/git_for_designers.html I am still a huge beginner when it comes to git, but I find the core commands mentioned in the tutorial to be simple and very effective. Best of luck.
  - davidw 17y ago
    Any hacker ought to be able to set up git, it's so simple. I might consider recommending github if someone doesn't have a server somewhere, but aside from that, it's just too simple to set up. svn isn't really that much harder.
nostrademons 17y ago
Headless git repository, hosted on a machine that you all have SSH access to? You really want a real version control system. Trying to hack one up from backup systems is just asking for pain. VCS gives you much more than just a central off-site repository - you get commit logs, conflict resolution, diffs, rollbacks, branches, etc. Oh, +1 for GitHub too. They're great.
saikat 17y ago
Mercurial with bitbucket is great. Bitbucket offers one private repository (I think this is a new thing, but I'm not sure) for free, so it seems fine for use with closed-source code, if you need that. We also used mercurial for a while in conjunction with dropbox (just set up our central repository in dropbox). Mercurial is a lot less overbearing than SVN (very easy to setup repositories), so I recommend it highly for a small team. Git is also a great option, but I haven't used it myself (and it doesn't seem like github offers free repositories yet unless you are an open source project).
bbuffone 17y ago
Formal source control is always a good idea, even if you are working on a project yourself. A three person shop will have some overlapping development of resources. So being able to undo changes and resolve conflicts will be necessary. As the team grows putting in other policies on checkin comments and ensuring not to break the build will become necessary. Lots of people are using github.com, I have been using unfuddle.com and it has worked out well. I also make sure I install a SVN server on everyone of my development machines as soon as I get it. Takes minutes to do and will keep my projects and files save.
khangtoh 17y ago
I don't feel SVN is a little overbearing for a 3 person team. If you just don't want the trouble of hosting the SVN server yourself, there're a few options for SVN hosting. Unfuddle seems like a reliable and popular choice. http://unfuddle.com/about/tour/plans http://unfuddle.com/about/tour/plans
deleted 17y ago
[deleted]
FraaJad 17y ago
bitbucket.org allows you to host One private mercurial repository for free. You might want to go with mercurial because it's arguably as good as git while having a better tool support on windows. Of course, it works excellently on linux and mac. If you prefer git, you can set up your own git repository with little effort by following this tutorial: http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-easy-and-secure-way http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-e... I have used this tutorial to set up repos at work and a private repo. AFAIK, github does not provide any private repositories for free.
- silas 17y ago
  ... for free.
- uggedal 17y ago
  I started with one free private repository on bitbucket. After I started a second venture last week I signed up for their basic account ($5, 5 private repositories, 500GB). I use both git and mercurial, so I could just as well have signed up with github.com. The reason for choosing bitbucket? Stability and speed. I've encountered 50+ error pages on github and on several occasions their servers were down when I needed access to some code. I also feel their site it a little slow at times (it was pretty snappy in their invite only beta days though). Bitbucket on the other hand have never failed me (user for ~1 year) and the UI is very responsive.
carterschonwald 17y ago
I like using darcs with the each person having a local repo and a shared one using dropbox
stevejohnson 17y ago
Mercurial+BitBucket and Git+Github are almost interchangeable. If a team member is on Windows, go with Mercurial+BitBucket, as it has much better cross-platform support. Otherwise, use Git+Github because it has a great community, good documentation (both have this), and many pretty charts to look at.
- Confusion 17y ago
  Google recentely opted for Mercurial (partly) for that exact reason: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis
tdupree 17y ago
I have been happy using Beanstalk for SVN hosting. The free version is working out nicely for my team of three. http://beanstalkapp.com http://beanstalkapp.com
zacharydanger 17y ago
Actually, you're onto something with Dropbox. Currently, I keep a copy of my Git repository in my dropbox and set it up as a named remote. Then I can just: git push dropbox You can run into issues if two people push to the Dropbox before the files get fully sync'd between computers, if that's the case, you need a hosted solution see the gitosis project for rolling your own or github.com for a slick paid solution.
paulgb 17y ago
Subversion is a fair bit less overbearing if you ignore the branches/merging stuff, which you probably don't need in a 3 person team anyway (yet). I would stick to svn if the team is already familiar with it but not with git. Otherwise, +1 to github.
dryicerx 17y ago
Svn would be perfect for you Our personal setup: linode with svn, redmine as issue tracker, wiki, and discussions). I went with our own server because I know for sure our data is private, and fine grain control.
psyklic 17y ago
Wow just a year or two ago everyone would have said SVN/CVS!
billclerico 17y ago
thanks all
8-bit_Blaster 17y ago
If you don't mind open sourcing your code I'd suggest using Google Code to host your project. Google Code was my first experience with code repositories and using it with the TortoiseSVN right-clicky GUI software made things that much easier to manage. (I used the Windows XP version of TortoiseSVN.) Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/GettingStarted http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/GettingStarted TortoiseSVN: http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ Simple, no command line stuff, and did exactly what I needed it to do. :)
cgbrown 17y ago
I work at ProjectLocker (http://www.projectlocker.com http://www.projectlocker.com), and we have free plans for Subversion or Git that would suit your team, and paid plans with more space and/or users for as low as $25 per year or $5 per month. Source control, even for just one person, is useful and doesn't have to be heavyweight. Even single developers may need to roll back in time or read notes from a few months ago about why they made an obscure change. It's worth the minimal overhead to have the protection, historical data, and in a multi-user scenario, to know who's doing what so you don't step on each other's toes. Whatever solution you choose, go hosted; it's straightforward, secure, and saves you the trouble of having to manage disaster recovery, network issues, and so on. Compare us to the competition and pick the one that's best for you. Good luck!
catone 17y ago
I'll just throw Codebase into the mix: http://www.codebasehq.com/ http://www.codebasehq.com/ It's my friend Adam's app (he's an admin at Rails Forum). I've never used it personally, but from what I have seen it is pretty nice and I know anything Adam is involved with must be solid. So, just presenting it as another option. It's sort of like Basecamp + Git with a little Lighthouse thrown in for good measure (or something like that). ;)

22 points by billclerico 17y ago

SVN seems a little too overbearing just yet - any clever solutions with dropbox or the like?

Dobbs 17y ago

Look up git.

Zarathu 17y ago

Github.com I'd use it for a 2-person team. It's incredible. (No. Use a repository.)

davidmathers 17y ago

github

apsurd 17y ago
+1 to github. Yes you can use git for free if you know how to set it up, but for $12/month in your case ($7 in mine), I just like the convenience of having someone else continually worry and work on all that stuff. It's also important to think like an entrepreneur. Focus on what you are good at, delegate everything else to people good at those things. Git specifically: I knew absolutely nothing about version control when I started looking into it. (about a month ago). My project will soon be open source so i know I needed to start thinking in terms of version control. I picked git over svn very simply because git was made by Linus. Git seems (to me) to have a better quality following as of now. I like being in the best company (it's bound to rub off). This tutorial was/is very helpful to me: http://hoth.entp.com/output/git_for_designers.html http://hoth.entp.com/output/git_for_designers.html I am still a huge beginner when it comes to git, but I find the core commands mentioned in the tutorial to be simple and very effective. Best of luck.
- davidw 17y ago
  Any hacker ought to be able to set up git, it's so simple. I might consider recommending github if someone doesn't have a server somewhere, but aside from that, it's just too simple to set up. svn isn't really that much harder.

nostrademons 17y ago

Headless git repository, hosted on a machine that you all have SSH access to? You really want a real version control system. Trying to hack one up from backup systems is just asking for pain. VCS gives you much more than just a central off-site repository - you get commit logs, conflict resolution, diffs, rollbacks, branches, etc. Oh, +1 for GitHub too. They're great.

saikat 17y ago

Mercurial with bitbucket is great. Bitbucket offers one private repository (I think this is a new thing, but I'm not sure) for free, so it seems fine for use with closed-source code, if you need that. We also used mercurial for a while in conjunction with dropbox (just set up our central repository in dropbox). Mercurial is a lot less overbearing than SVN (very easy to setup repositories), so I recommend it highly for a small team. Git is also a great option, but I haven't used it myself (and it doesn't seem like github offers free repositories yet unless you are an open source project).

bbuffone 17y ago

Formal source control is always a good idea, even if you are working on a project yourself. A three person shop will have some overlapping development of resources. So being able to undo changes and resolve conflicts will be necessary. As the team grows putting in other policies on checkin comments and ensuring not to break the build will become necessary. Lots of people are using github.com, I have been using unfuddle.com and it has worked out well. I also make sure I install a SVN server on everyone of my development machines as soon as I get it. Takes minutes to do and will keep my projects and files save.

khangtoh 17y ago

I don't feel SVN is a little overbearing for a 3 person team. If you just don't want the trouble of hosting the SVN server yourself, there're a few options for SVN hosting. Unfuddle seems like a reliable and popular choice. http://unfuddle.com/about/tour/plans http://unfuddle.com/about/tour/plans

deleted 17y ago

[deleted]

FraaJad 17y ago

bitbucket.org allows you to host One private mercurial repository for free. You might want to go with mercurial because it's arguably as good as git while having a better tool support on windows. Of course, it works excellently on linux and mac. If you prefer git, you can set up your own git repository with little effort by following this tutorial: http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-easy-and-secure-way http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-e... I have used this tutorial to set up repos at work and a private repo. AFAIK, github does not provide any private repositories for free.

silas 17y ago
... for free.
uggedal 17y ago
I started with one free private repository on bitbucket. After I started a second venture last week I signed up for their basic account ($5, 5 private repositories, 500GB). I use both git and mercurial, so I could just as well have signed up with github.com. The reason for choosing bitbucket? Stability and speed. I've encountered 50+ error pages on github and on several occasions their servers were down when I needed access to some code. I also feel their site it a little slow at times (it was pretty snappy in their invite only beta days though). Bitbucket on the other hand have never failed me (user for ~1 year) and the UI is very responsive.

carterschonwald 17y ago

I like using darcs with the each person having a local repo and a shared one using dropbox

stevejohnson 17y ago

Mercurial+BitBucket and Git+Github are almost interchangeable. If a team member is on Windows, go with Mercurial+BitBucket, as it has much better cross-platform support. Otherwise, use Git+Github because it has a great community, good documentation (both have this), and many pretty charts to look at.

Confusion 17y ago
Google recentely opted for Mercurial (partly) for that exact reason: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis

tdupree 17y ago

I have been happy using Beanstalk for SVN hosting. The free version is working out nicely for my team of three. http://beanstalkapp.com http://beanstalkapp.com

zacharydanger 17y ago

Actually, you're onto something with Dropbox. Currently, I keep a copy of my Git repository in my dropbox and set it up as a named remote. Then I can just: git push dropbox You can run into issues if two people push to the Dropbox before the files get fully sync'd between computers, if that's the case, you need a hosted solution see the gitosis project for rolling your own or github.com for a slick paid solution.

paulgb 17y ago

Subversion is a fair bit less overbearing if you ignore the branches/merging stuff, which you probably don't need in a 3 person team anyway (yet). I would stick to svn if the team is already familiar with it but not with git. Otherwise, +1 to github.

dryicerx 17y ago

Svn would be perfect for you Our personal setup: linode with svn, redmine as issue tracker, wiki, and discussions). I went with our own server because I know for sure our data is private, and fine grain control.

psyklic 17y ago

Wow just a year or two ago everyone would have said SVN/CVS!

billclerico 17y ago

thanks all

8-bit_Blaster 17y ago

If you don't mind open sourcing your code I'd suggest using Google Code to host your project. Google Code was my first experience with code repositories and using it with the TortoiseSVN right-clicky GUI software made things that much easier to manage. (I used the Windows XP version of TortoiseSVN.) Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/GettingStarted http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/GettingStarted TortoiseSVN: http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ Simple, no command line stuff, and did exactly what I needed it to do. :)

cgbrown 17y ago

I work at ProjectLocker (http://www.projectlocker.com http://www.projectlocker.com), and we have free plans for Subversion or Git that would suit your team, and paid plans with more space and/or users for as low as $25 per year or $5 per month. Source control, even for just one person, is useful and doesn't have to be heavyweight. Even single developers may need to roll back in time or read notes from a few months ago about why they made an obscure change. It's worth the minimal overhead to have the protection, historical data, and in a multi-user scenario, to know who's doing what so you don't step on each other's toes. Whatever solution you choose, go hosted; it's straightforward, secure, and saves you the trouble of having to manage disaster recovery, network issues, and so on. Compare us to the competition and pick the one that's best for you. Good luck!

catone 17y ago

I'll just throw Codebase into the mix: http://www.codebasehq.com/ http://www.codebasehq.com/ It's my friend Adam's app (he's an admin at Rails Forum). I've never used it personally, but from what I have seen it is pretty nice and I know anything Adam is involved with must be solid. So, just presenting it as another option. It's sort of like Basecamp + Git with a little Lighthouse thrown in for good measure (or something like that). ;)