4 ms·
"...but there is something I wish would happen first. An LTS release of an open source compiler." Surprising that this doesn't already exist--Apple and RedHat
by mjs 13y ago
"...but there is something I wish would happen first.
An LTS release of an open source compiler."
Surprising that this doesn't already exist--Apple and RedHat and Ubuntu, etc. must all maintain what is in effect a LTS version of the compilers they ship, in the same way that OpenBSD does.
- jevinskie 13y agoNo, Apple's compiler group moves very fast. They cut from LLVM/Clang ToT for each new release.
- Argorak 13y agoIn the case of Apple (LLVM/clang), having an in-house compiler gives you a certain level of independence from those kinds of problems.
- thisrod 13y agoThere's a very stable C compiler out there: Ken Thompson's 1990s rewrite of Dennis Ritchie's 1970s original. Unfortunately it wouldn't solve OpenBSD's problem, being too stable to have caught up with C99 and C++. But I find it interesting to see where Ken and Dennis took their language while the standards committee wasn't watching. http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/2c http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/2c
- yassim 13y agoForgive my ignorance, but what does 'LTS' stand for?
- DomreiRoam 13y agoLTS: Long Term Support, it is a version that the editor/community will support for a long time. Here you find the policy for Ubuntu: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS .
- juhanima 13y agoLong Term Support