3 ms·
I get a little doubt. Its good, but I think we can all try to discern some facts here from what she's said. 1) She wasn't there so this is a second hand story
by bargl 13y ago
I get a little doubt. Its good, but I think we can all try to discern some facts here from what she's said.
1) She wasn't there so this is a second hand story. Most second hand stories are embellished to a certain degree. Fact is she just wasn't there. (from her twitter) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6140924 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6140924
2) Government agents (who knows where they are from because who has time to remember THOSE details in the moment). FBI, Internal Task Force, MIB, it really doesn't matter that much.
3) Were they merely concerned with Pressure cookers, backpacks, and quinoa. That is all just conjecture and really not relevant to the story.
The REAL issue here is that government agents appeared on her doorstep and asked to come in, for no apparent reason. Then they asked a bunch of questions that made her feel as if she was a suspicious character. This all causes an atmosphere of fear, similar to what special police units in other countries have done.
This is about the fact that she doesn't know WHY they came by. Sure she's speculating to make herself feel better, who wouldn't but what's more important is that there is someone watching you out there and determining if a person is suspicious or not and we (US citizens) have NO control over that. Matter of fact we don't even know what it is all about.
Did she make this story up. Sure, in part. But there is a core set of facts here (assuming she is just elaborating and not lying out right) that are hard to ignore.
Big brother is watching you...
EDIT: For the comment below. If you are curious how they are doing this, the best theory I've seen has come from Steve Gibson on his Security Now podcast. He speculates that they are taking raw data before it goes to Google and explains how that may be possible. https://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm https://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm start with episode #408.
- joering2 13y ago> The REAL issue here is that government agents appeared on her doorstep and asked to come in, for no apparent reason. They search pressure cookers and backpack and got the visit from gov agents after boston bombing. how hard is it to put 1+1 ? The REAL question is: what kind of cooperation is Google in this time that not long after doing one of trillion searches in a popular browser you get gov officials exactly at your doorstep? It seems they have to be tapping into the google bloodstream, because I am not aware of any Google department that big that could weed through billions of searches and flag those as potential t. and hand them over to officials. Anyone?
- gohrt 13y agoThe truth is always more mundane. She posted a picture of explosives on her public Facebook timeline. https://plus.sandbox.google.com/112961607570158342254/posts/FWAVRVaN64h https://plus.sandbox.google.com/112961607570158342254/posts/...