Firstly the article explicitly stated the authors belief that it could be FRAND and I disagree with that. Really that is probably the fundamental area for disa

Firstly the article explicitly stated the authors belief that it could be FRAND and I disagree with that. Really that is probably the fundamental area for disagreement in these FRAND cases and can be debated without reference to a particular case (and having to get into a detailed who did and said what session). Secondly I'm not sure that there is much dispute that any cash deal offered was probably beyond the bounds of reasonableness. I fear the ITC wants to be relevant so it is using the only sanction it has (import bans) despite the inappropriateness in the case of FRAND patents.