1. It really depends on what you're after: are you looking for a video sequence that plays back, or an individual still? Video is better for the former, Snappy

1. It really depends on what you're after: are you looking for a video sequence that plays back, or an individual still? Video is better for the former, SnappyCam for the latter. 2. It's a lot of work, hinted at in another thread here on HN. The entire "app" build on top of the JPEG codec needs to be built from scratch; new artwork is required, etc. 3. I just tried it from another machine and works for me. My backend API is being hammered at the moment, which is awesome, but it doesn't appear to be overloaded. (Gotta love NodeJS!)