2 ms·
It looks great but I have a few questions/comments. 1. What is the difference in quality between using this and the video capture mode? I.e. if what I really w
by chacham15 13y ago
It looks great but I have a few questions/comments.
1. What is the difference in quality between using this and the video capture mode? I.e. if what I really want is a high quality video, would this get me a better result than the built in programs?
2. Seeing as how you've done all this work (and how Android apps can be compiled from C) how difficult is it to port this to Android so that the rest of us can get in on it?
3. Is it just me, or can anyone else not change the settings / look at the other demos on the samples page?
- jpap 13y ago1. It really depends on what you're after: are you looking for a video sequence that plays back, or an individual still? Video is better for the former, SnappyCam for the latter. 2. It's a lot of work, hinted at in another thread here on HN. The entire "app" build on top of the JPEG codec needs to be built from scratch; new artwork is required, etc. 3. I just tried it from another machine and works for me. My backend API is being hammered at the moment, which is awesome, but it doesn't appear to be overloaded. (Gotta love NodeJS!)
- sgustard 13y agoI have the same issue (3), on Safari and Chrome: mouse clicks in the menus after they're opened are ignored, but the keyboard works to select a video.
- jpap 13y agoWeird. Could be a bug in the dropdown component I wrote in AngularJS. :( Glad the keyboard still works. Will look into it...