4 ms·
Actually, the one main benefit is that they can be parsed as URLs, both visually and by things like email programs. Compare: "For the latest blog post, just h
by ryanwaggoner 18y ago
Actually, the one main benefit is that they can be parsed as URLs, both visually and by things like email programs. Compare:
"For the latest blog post, just head to elliottkember."
"For the latest blog post, just head to http://elliottkember.com http://elliottkember.com
The first one makes no sense, while the second is obviously talking about a web URL. I'm sure there are other ways to make this work, but this author's post feels like a solution in search of a problem. At the very least, it's hardly "madness".
- zandorg 18y agoPeople who advertise their company (for example, on the side of one of their trucks) sometimes start it with a www. which would fail one of those OS-detected http:// http:// tests which only look for http:// http:// and not www.
- skwiddor 18y agoMy OS isn't very good at reading the side of trucks
- randomwalker 18y agoThis is even more of an issue in conversation. Although the http can be omitted, the .com is often the only clue that the speaker is referring to a web address.
- aneesh 18y agoI remember a psychology study that showed people recognize www.yahoo.com as a url more quickly than yahoo.com -- with the latter, you don't see the ".com" until you get to the end of the phrase, and that's when you realize it's a url. I can only imagine that getting rid of the .com would make things even worse.
- marcus 18y agoThat is because of psychological mechanism called Priming, basically an earlier input can affect your perception of a later input. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology)
- jackchristopher 18y agoWhen I give my email I omit the .com. But I think this works with popular hosts only, like gmail or yahoo. I say "myname at yahoo" and people know to fill the rest. If I can keep something implicit I will.