4 ms·
I would feel a lot better about Slate (and everyone else) if they didn't run those "SPONSORED FROM AROUND THE WEB" pseudo-article links at the bottom of each pa
by MartinCron 13y ago
I would feel a lot better about Slate (and everyone else) if they didn't run those "SPONSORED FROM AROUND THE WEB" pseudo-article links at the bottom of each page with this exact same kind of manipulative ads in them.
Come on Slate. You think better of your audience than this, right?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- brandnewlow 13y agoThey are a plague run by publishers to try to boost their own traffic and revenue via arbitrage. I complained to the Slate folks about the image as running under their articles these day. Those are really awful.
- gee_totes 13y agoPlague? That depends on what you click on. Since I can't get rid of them (even with Adblock), I've trained those ad tracking/interest algorithms to add a "scroll down for boobs" feature to their client websites.
- stephengillie 13y agoAdd in the adblocking Hosts file (and maybe Ghostery) on top of Adblock to really get rid of them. http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
- eli 13y agoThat's Outbrain: http://www.outbrain.com/engage/ http://www.outbrain.com/engage/ In theory the ads are targeted to the content of the site, but I agree that they're often pretty crummy.
- ig1 13y agoAs far as I can tell, that's not Outbrain, Outbrain is the "More from Slate" / "From Around the Web" section. The "SPONSORED FROM AROUND THE WEB" section appears to be a standard ad panel from Content.ad.
- eli 13y agoYou're right! I thought "From Around the Web" was what we were talking about, but of course there are multiple similar blocks of paid links.
- ibudiallo 13y agoOne weird trick that conquered the internet. It looks like it worked, cause I clicked and read the article only to find out that it is exactly what I thought in the first place. But still I spent a good 10 minutes on it.
- valgaze 13y agoLook at article #3: http://snag.gy/K0uB5.jpg http://snag.gy/K0uB5.jpg
- wutbrodo 13y agoA couple of years ago I read an NBC article[1] about low-quality, spammy ads on the Web. The article was decidedly negative about them....and yet (at least at the time) the page was full of them: "Billionaire prepares for financial ruin" etc, all the AdBlade/Taboola-type shit. It was pretty ridiculous, given that the tone of the article from the very beginning was positively railing against low-quality ads. [1] http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32676456/ns/business-the_big_money/t/love-god-i-dont-want-whiter-teeth/ http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32676456/ns/business-the_big_money...