7 ms·
I don't understand, the first basic rule of intelligence services is you can't use any of their information in court. It's the basic premise behind giving them
by revelation 13y ago
I don't understand, the first basic rule of intelligence services is you can't use any of their information in court. It's the basic premise behind giving them unlimited privileges.
- bediger4000 13y agoRight, so the dragnet surveillance isn't good for regular, American-style, jury of your peers type of trials. Dragnet surveillance is only good for guilt-by-association, which really has no place in US jurisprudence. That "voice of authority" type of guilt is un-American, and non-rational, when we get down to it.
- tianhe 13y agoI dont see anything wrong with a simple acknowledge. there has to be some oversight on what information should be redacted, when they are used to build a case