> not just speculation/baseless accusation. Having read the article, it is clear that it is not baseless speculation. Two benchmarks running the same code, bu

> not just speculation/baseless accusation. Having read the article, it is clear that it is not baseless speculation. Two benchmarks running the same code, but with a different name. One runs faster than the other. The one that runs faster has it's name hardcoded in the samsung binaries. You are right that the source code could show a fuller picture, but I'd say this is an example of good reporting and not speculation.