3 ms·
It's disingenuous to talk about 100 different software systems powering things. Maybe there are 100, but 97 of them don't matter. Lots of desktop OS's too, but
by clarky07 13y ago
It's disingenuous to talk about 100 different software systems powering things. Maybe there are 100, but 97 of them don't matter. Lots of desktop OS's too, but pretty sure most people are only targeting windows, mac, and linux. Nothing else comes close to 1% of the market.
The problem isn't that I can't make an app for all the Android devices. The problem is that I can't make it as good as I'd want for all intents and purposes. Developing for iPhone, I can easily hit 95-99% of the market without making any sacrifices at all. It will look good and it will work on every phone, all while allowing me to use the latest features and API's. With Android, the app WILL NOT look as good as the iPhone version on some of the phones. 34% of the market is using something released over 2 years ago, and several major version ago.
I actually like Android, and developing for it isn't the worst thing in the world. But to say it isn't fragmented and doesn't create headaches for developers is absurd. It absolutely adds to fragmentation, and parts of it are a real pain.
- bookwormAT 13y ago"Maybe there are 100, but 97 of them don't matter." Please reread my post. I'm referring to the software on the Galaxy S, the HTC One etc. as independent operating systems. These OSes matter. It's what people use today on their computers. Android is not an operating system in the sense that Windows or iOS is. It's a platform on which you build such an OS.