3 ms·
Just tried it on a program I had lying around and PyPy3 2.1b1 took about 37 times the time that PyPy 2.0.2 takes to run it. So, yeah, some performance regressio
by omaranto 13y ago
Just tried it on a program I had lying around and PyPy3 2.1b1 took about 37 times the time that PyPy 2.0.2 takes to run it. So, yeah, some performance regressions, but it's still great news that Python 3 support is here!
- nodata 13y agoOuch. I'd submit the program to them to test.