6 ms·
But this way I don't have to keep paying $20/mo to Adobe CC so that I can run the script again next month.
by jdboyd 13y ago
But this way I don't have to keep paying $20/mo to Adobe CC so that I can run the script again next month.
- jlgreco 13y agoI suspect that you could probably also manage it with GIMP/guile, but I don't suspect it would be particularly pleasant.
- _delirium 13y agoIf you want to script it, ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick are probably a better bet than trying to hack up something with GIMP batch processing: http://www.imagemagick.com/www/formats.html http://www.imagemagick.com/www/formats.html If you just want to do basic conversion ignoring layers, it's quite easy: for f in *.psd; do convert "$f" "${f%%.psd}.png" done
- picomancer 13y agoYou can use find/xargs for this. It'll be faster because you can parallelize it with the -P option, for example, for a 4-core machine: find . -iname "*.psd" -print0 | xargs -0 -P 4 -n 1 -I I convert I I.png For best results, change the number "4" in the above command to the number of cores you have.
- neeee 13y agoThe same with GNU Parallel, only it picks the right number of cores automatically and removes .psd from the file name: find . -iname "*.psd" -print0 | parallel -0 convert '{}' '{.}.png'
- jlgreco 13y agoOh excellent, I didn't know ImageMagick did PSD.
- toble 13y agoGimp's support for PSD is understandably poor for the more advanced/modern features, so I wouldn't rely on it without being able to compare the output to something else. I use Apple's Preview utility to manually compare results.