3 ms·

scott_karana - What you're describing is true, but is closer to anarchy (which I'm not quite an advocate for). Do I think the military forces have grown to an

• cobrausn 13y ago
  No, it's not. It's advocating what the founders originally intended, which was a well-armed militia that obviates the need for an Army. In time of war (on American soil) they would organize like an army to fight off invaders. They did advocate for a Navy, however, because it was (and I suppose still is) necessary for the establishment of free trade routes between nations. I am former military, as an aside, and once found the notion of not having an Army pretty silly, but the notion has grown on me slightly.