4 ms·
You're welcome to actually explain that distinction. Otherwise, it's just intuition.
by saraid216 13y ago
You're welcome to actually explain that distinction. Otherwise, it's just intuition.
- erikpukinskis 13y agoSure! There are of course many distinctions, but here is one I think is quite relevant: MIT made its decisions with the knowledge that Aaron was being prosecuted, and therefore were in a position to consciously influence the outcome of the case. JSTOR and the Royal Society in '99 did not, and therefore were not.