3 ms·
So, which?
by xenophanes 17y ago
So, which?
- rms 17y agoI would think it is table games not because of floor space, but because of high rollers. No one is playing slots for $50,000 a spin.
- sokoloff 17y agoThere's basically no labor component to slots (there's some maintenance I'm sure), making slots far more profitable on a $ take per square foot basis. This is anecdotal, but I've never seen a casino tear out slots to put in table games (on a net square foot basis), but plenty of casinos in CT and NV have removed table games to add slots (frustrating as a poker player).