4 ms·
I was under the impression (again, folk-lore, mailing lists etc.) that Go had a conservative collector. I can't find an official documentation link that'll tell
by chetanahuja 13y ago
I was under the impression (again, folk-lore, mailing lists etc.) that Go had a conservative collector. I can't find an official documentation link that'll tell me if it is or not at the moment.
- twotwotwo 13y agoThis neat StackOverflow answer appears to be by the 'atom' fellow who contributed a patch to make the collector more precise (patch review = https://codereview.appspot.com/7307086/ https://codereview.appspot.com/7307086/): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7823725/what-kind-of-garbage-collection-does-go-use http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7823725/what-kind-of-garb... Atom also says 1.0's was more conservative, but, as Brad also said, still didn't scan "objects such as []byte" (meaning all plain-old-data arrays? who knows). The Go 1.1 Release Notes mention the collector becoming more precise, which was a particular issue on 32-bit because big heaps could span a lot of the address space. You can see the GC source itself doing some per-type switching: https://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse/src/pkg/runtime/mgc0.c https://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse/src/pkg/runtime/m... At some point, this sort of discussion probably gets you less useful info per unit effort than just playing with a Go distribution, trying out whatever toy programs you find interesting.