3 ms·
> I don't think a competent IS&T would have gone directly to the Cambridge police if there were no MIT police. Can you explain this more? INLINE EDIT: I take
by danielweber 13y ago
> I don't think a competent IS&T would have gone directly to the Cambridge police if there were no MIT police.
Can you explain this more? INLINE EDIT: I take it you are saying that IS&T would have not gone to the Cambridge Police Department at all if there were no Campus Police. I'm not sure this follows. They wanted to get this person to stop, and they surely could have just confiscated this laptop, but that may have actually been illegal since it wasn't theirs.
Edit: Need some explanation on this, too:
> I love how MIT tries to pin blame on their budgetary cutbacks and staff furloughs, too.
I assume you are referring to page 20, when MIT employees didn't respond until January 3rd to a JSTOR email sent on December 26/27th. How are they "pinning blame" on anything there? It reads as a very straightforward description of the timeline.