4 ms·
First world problems. I agree it isn't always fun to share the world with racists, bigots, and religious fanatics; but I am skeptical of the utility of hiding o
by fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
First world problems. I agree it isn't always fun to share the world with racists, bigots, and religious fanatics; but I am skeptical of the utility of hiding offensive speech. It might be better to let everyone see what they are.
Also, making trivial moderation requests takes time away from moderators who might be dealing with the really terrible things happening on the intnernet:
https://theinternetoffendsme.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/the-real-story-behind-facebook-moderation-and-your-petty-reports/ https://theinternetoffendsme.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/the-re...
- MartinCron 13y agoI am skeptical of the utility of hiding offensive speech I share that, but I am also really seduced by the idea of interacting in a space free of that kind of toxic garbage. The same way I prefer to go to restaurants that don't allow smoking. If there's an appropriate place for offensive speech, I'll prefer to not be there. Maybe instead of "flag as abusive" the interaction should be nudging people into their appropriate cesspools.
- steveklabnik 13y agoThis is actually one of the reasons /b/ still exists: if /b/ went away, they'd just post all over the rest of 4chan, and at least all the toxic waste can just be concentrated in one place.
- MartinCron 13y agoThat's exactly what I was thinking. "appropriate cesspool" is a pretty transparent /b reference.