3 ms·

eh, yes.. now what? You do realize that the HTTP RFCs define what protcols are used? I know that most TCP improvements mostly add new behaviour to specific sit

by X4 13y ago

eh, yes.. now what? You do realize that the HTTP RFCs define what protcols are used? I know that most TCP improvements mostly add new behaviour to specific situations, especially congestion and yes I have read those papers/links. I know that many improvements are UDP based. So, I think you misread it. I said kill TCP/IP in order to replace it by something better and wished that HTTP/2.0 would be that anticipated step. Did you even check the alternatives, before going negative?

jimktrains2 13y ago
> Did you even check the alternatives, before going negative? One does not need alternatives to dislike a system. Alternatives may affect if the system is used, but they don't negate criticism of it. I don't think HTTP 2 should replace TCP/IP or any other protocol that low in the OSI stack. That is not what HTTP was designed for and I believe throwing out the ideas behind its creation and still calling a new protocol HTTP is disingenuous.