4 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptographic_hash_functions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptographic_ha... or more specifically:
by chacham15 13y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptographic_hash_functions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptographic_ha...
or more specifically: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_16 and http://eprint.iacr.org/2010/016.pdf http://eprint.iacr.org/2010/016.pdf
- harshreality 13y agoThe attacks are on reduced-round versions of SHA-256 and SHA-512. Those do not describe any attacks faster than (dumb) brute force against SHA-256 or SHA-512. I think labeling SHA-256 as orange is highly misleading. The SHA-2 family of hashes is going nowhere unless the partial-round attacks get a lot closer to the full-round versions. They're still about 20+ rounds away.