5 ms·

I took it to mean that the 10 minute window was when the driver was driving past the LSE, where the detectors where.

by nfm 13y ago

michaelwww 13y ago
It's even less likely he jams signals where ever he goes and LSE just happened to notice it. His company would be very curious why he was disappearing. They can pull him on a screen and watch when he goes in and out of range. It would happen only to him, in whatever vehicle he happens to check out that day. A driver would have to be far more clever than that. The article states "timestamps on trades made in financial institutions can be affected" There's your likely culprit; someone who for whatever reason needs to affect timestamps.
- bjcubsfan 13y ago
  I think it's likely a driver who is constantly jamming his GPS. I have seen this in work with the FAA. A driver will go past the airport or park and deliver something. We see a temporary GPS outage which have traced back to delivery drivers in several instances. I imagine their company assumes their GPS equipment is broken, but still lets them drive.
  - michaelwww 13y ago
    It seems like an airport would be pretty eager to identify and prevent this so it doesn't go on. Maybe the London Stock Exchange doesn't care as much, but if it messes with trades?
- aet 13y ago
  I'm curious as how this disruption could be used in a financial scenario. If you disrupt the GPS for 10 minutes, would the timestamps really go that out of whack?
  - dllthomas 13y ago
    And more importantly, will they go out of whack in a way that's useful? Being able to shift the timestamps a few microseconds could be quite valuable if you can do it only to your order gateways (and ensure it's in the correct direction) but "jamming GPS" doesn't seem to get you that. I'm not going to say there's nothing it could be used for, but it's not jumping out at me.
  - jlgaddis 13y ago
    They shouldn't, of course (not over a period of time as small as 10 minutes). Remember, though, that the time a trade occurred (at the sub-millisecond level) might well mean thousands of dollars (or more).
tinco 13y ago
I think the parent means that the person who is driving past the LSE with his jammer is less likely a delivery driver, as they are under close scrutiny but rather anyone else. Might as well be anyone who'd rather not be tracked if they can help it. I can imagine perhaps a VIP or even an organized crime member who prefers their car free of GPS trackers when they drive around town visiting associates.

I took it to mean that the 10 minute window was when the driver was driving past the LSE, where the detectors where.

by nfm 13y ago

I took it to mean that the 10 minute window was when the driver was driving past the LSE, where the detectors where.

It's even less likely he jams signals where ever he goes and LSE just happened to notice it. His company would be very curious why he was disappearing. They can pull him on a screen and watch when he goes in and out of range. It would happen only to him, in whatever vehicle he happens to check out that day. A driver would have to be far more clever than that. The article states "timestamps on trades made in financial institutions can be affected" There's your likely culprit; someone who for whatever reason needs to affect timestamps.

bjcubsfan 13y ago
I think it's likely a driver who is constantly jamming his GPS. I have seen this in work with the FAA. A driver will go past the airport or park and deliver something. We see a temporary GPS outage which have traced back to delivery drivers in several instances. I imagine their company assumes their GPS equipment is broken, but still lets them drive.
- michaelwww 13y ago
  It seems like an airport would be pretty eager to identify and prevent this so it doesn't go on. Maybe the London Stock Exchange doesn't care as much, but if it messes with trades?
aet 13y ago
I'm curious as how this disruption could be used in a financial scenario. If you disrupt the GPS for 10 minutes, would the timestamps really go that out of whack?
- dllthomas 13y ago
  And more importantly, will they go out of whack in a way that's useful? Being able to shift the timestamps a few microseconds could be quite valuable if you can do it only to your order gateways (and ensure it's in the correct direction) but "jamming GPS" doesn't seem to get you that. I'm not going to say there's nothing it could be used for, but it's not jumping out at me.
- jlgaddis 13y ago
  They shouldn't, of course (not over a period of time as small as 10 minutes). Remember, though, that the time a trade occurred (at the sub-millisecond level) might well mean thousands of dollars (or more).

tinco 13y ago

I think the parent means that the person who is driving past the LSE with his jammer is less likely a delivery driver, as they are under close scrutiny but rather anyone else. Might as well be anyone who'd rather not be tracked if they can help it. I can imagine perhaps a VIP or even an organized crime member who prefers their car free of GPS trackers when they drive around town visiting associates.