3 ms·
IP-based pricing is in itself not illegal in any jurisdiction I am aware of, but that doesn't mean you're in the clear. Legally, you may not charge one protect
by ignostic 13y ago
IP-based pricing is in itself not illegal in any jurisdiction I am aware of, but that doesn't mean you're in the clear.
Legally, you may not charge one protected class more than another. For example, you cannot charge a racial minority more or less for the same service.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_discrimination#Discrimination_based_on_price http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_discrimination#Discrim...
But that's not what you're trying to do, right? You don't mean to discriminate intentionally. That just means you are not guilty of "disparate treatment." IP-based pricing will, however, almost definitely lead to "disparate impact."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact
If you charge people in certain areas more, you're almost certainly going to end up charging more on average to people of a race, religion, or other protected class. It might not be your intent, but the outcome will be the same.
Given the potential PR or legal problems, I'd strongly advise you not to price a product or service based on geographical regions.
- lifeisstillgood 13y agoIt seems that one ends up relying on the registered address of the credit card to determine if someone lives in UK and so can download the service from .co.uk