4 ms·
Very similar to what I am currently working on, so I would say: superb idea ;) I would obviously love to ear updates along the way about how you guys are doing.
by kettlr 13y ago
Very similar to what I am currently working on, so I would say: superb idea ;) I would obviously love to ear updates along the way about how you guys are doing...
The thing that is mainly taking me aback is your pricing. I had settled on a much higher one (kind of)... That would be one-time 300$ for publication and 5% revenue but without the cap. Although the cap is amazing for big publishers I would avoid it for the complexity added to the pricing model.
There is great value there why is you guys's pricing so low? Is it because all the features are not yet developed, and are you then planning on increasing the pricing in the future? What are you thoughts about the pricing suggested above?
(we used to sell copies of famous editing software thrice the price to individuals. Things are sure evolving!)
- holgersindbaek 13y agoBecause we can would be the simple answer. The reason we have the cap on the percentages, is that we don't want to scare guys who already have a semi-established magazine away. I think even 5% (no cap) would scare a lot of more established magazines away. But that's just my guess.