3 ms·
The article seems to imply that there's a large imbalance between employer and employees, specifically that companies go to great pains for employee retention.
by ihsw 13y ago
The article seems to imply that there's a large imbalance between employer and employees, specifically that companies go to great pains for employee retention. Employee retention is expensive and it could be construed that the article writer equates perks with 'loyalty.'
So, to answer your question: all the time. By continuously offering perks they remain 'loyal' to you.
- eli_gottlieb 13y agoThen why don't they offer contracted, non-at-will employment?