4 ms·
And I'm quite sure that the logo's in the link below are intended to be used or are IN use. So, tell me, why are these companies with many highly experienced le
by Craigpd 13y ago
And I'm quite sure that the logo's in the link below are intended to be used or are IN use. So, tell me, why are these companies with many highly experienced legal advisers not fighting eachother over a logo?
http://img.ctrlv.in/img/51f6b5b849ebf.jpg http://img.ctrlv.in/img/51f6b5b849ebf.jpg
- loumf 13y agoYou can trademark using a round M for burgers, but that doesn't get you the trademark for banks. Witness Apple Records and Apple Computers. In this case, the products/ideas are straight-up competitors.
- Craigpd 13y agoOnly Apple go so far as to take such petty things to court. Most of their law suits can be generalised as "It looks similar from this side of the room"
- RobAtticus 13y agoI think I'm safe in assuming when you say "Only Apple" you mean Apple Computers. However, it was actually Apple Records who sued Apple Computers, not the other way around.
- marshray 13y agoYeah, I get the two confused all the time. Oh wait
- century24 13y agoA pre-binary of an existing project and an idea that you had that you've conveniently been sitting on for a year are very different things. This isn't competition. It's complaining on a professional level.