3 ms·
> As such, why not just leave the logo of Tox in peace? I have plans for it. It wasn't just an idle doodle.
by latitude 13y ago
> As such, why not just leave the logo of Tox in peace?
I have plans for it. It wasn't just an idle doodle.
- Craigpd 13y agoAnd I'm quite sure that the logo's in the link below are intended to be used or are IN use. So, tell me, why are these companies with many highly experienced legal advisers not fighting eachother over a logo? http://img.ctrlv.in/img/51f6b5b849ebf.jpg http://img.ctrlv.in/img/51f6b5b849ebf.jpg
- loumf 13y agoYou can trademark using a round M for burgers, but that doesn't get you the trademark for banks. Witness Apple Records and Apple Computers. In this case, the products/ideas are straight-up competitors.
- Craigpd 13y agoOnly Apple go so far as to take such petty things to court. Most of their law suits can be generalised as "It looks similar from this side of the room"
- RobAtticus 13y agoI think I'm safe in assuming when you say "Only Apple" you mean Apple Computers. However, it was actually Apple Records who sued Apple Computers, not the other way around.
- marshray 13y agoYeah, I get the two confused all the time. Oh wait
- century24 13y agoA pre-binary of an existing project and an idea that you had that you've conveniently been sitting on for a year are very different things. This isn't competition. It's complaining on a professional level.
- jwarkentin 13y agoMany people make plans, few carry them out. You posted that March 21, 2012. Now, 1 year and 4 months later, someone apparently independently created a similar logo and is actually doing something with it, not just planning to do so. If you do something with it as well then great! I don't see what the big deal is.