3 ms·
It looks like it's time to break out this one again: http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html Be sure to note the date on this.
by rachelbythebay 13y ago
It looks like it's time to break out this one again:
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
Be sure to note the date on this.
- Afforess 13y agoAs a maintainer and volunteer on some open source projects, the reason for CADT is that popular projects receive significantly more bug reports than could ever be handled by their volunteers. We're just volunteers and you can't just throw more developers at the problem. In the end, you get what you pay for. Nothing.
- shadowfox 13y ago> significantly more bug reports than could ever be handled by their volunteers Maybe I misunderstood this. So are you saying that the same volunteers can handle a total rewrite of the module maintaining its specified (hopefully) behavior, while remaining incapable of fixing its bugs?
- chris_wot 13y agoIf the bug is still valid, then don't close it. It's not a competition for time to fix! If you don't know if the bug is fixed, don't close it. Certainly don't ask the reporter to log it again!