3 ms·
I'm not certain I disagree here, but you can make an argument that you're optimistic. >> When I decide to marry someone, I am not going to treat her like a sec
by berntb 17y ago
I'm not certain I disagree here, but you can make an argument that you're optimistic.
>> When I decide to marry someone, I am not going to treat her like a security or an asset or some other financial instrument -- she's a human being
Historically, what has failed most often? Securities or human beings?
I'd bet on humans.
A friend's friend got problems a decade ago -- wife left him, his company crashed etc. A while later, he was diagnosed with whiplash (I think, could have been mild brain damage) from a traffic accident. He probably can't work hard again, but has managed to build quite a good life.
I can tell you that I had (amongst other effects) something like personality changes when I had a painless tooth infection for quite a while.
Things like that are probably more common than we think.
Even if you could guarantee your emotional state for years to come, I doubt you can plan for changes like that. Usually, we tend to think of people as too static.
Fan of Catalyst, by the way.
- jrockway 17y agoEven if you could guarantee your emotional state for years to come, I doubt you can plan for changes like that. Usually, we tend to think of people as too static. Sure. But is it a good idea to protect yourself from an unlikely event in the future at the expense of hurting your partner right now?
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]