> If you want to incentivize outcomes and efficiency, fee-for-outcome is and obvious option. When I write a contract, there are often two prices: a minimum whi

> If you want to incentivize outcomes and efficiency, fee-for-outcome is and obvious option. When I write a contract, there are often two prices: a minimum which is stingy and a bonus which is far from it. The point is to say that if you do the minimum for this contract, you get a certain amount; if you excel, you get paid for that excellence. Translated to health care, I think I'd like to see doctors doing less paperwork and more doctoring. It's not perfect, but I trust competition to pay that excellence price to those who deserve it. That in turn means that if I need some kind of crucial care, I know where it can be found. If the system is over-regulated, that is not so.