3 ms·
I know Carl a little from the late 90s. I figured there was a 50% chance he would come up with something historically important, and a 60% chance he was crazy.
by tlb 13y ago
I know Carl a little from the late 90s. I figured there was a 50% chance he would come up with something historically important, and a 60% chance he was crazy. (The two options are not quite mutually exclusive.)
Indeed, most examples illustrating the Incompleteness Theorem involve self-reference. But, it seems hard to prove anything interesting in a system that precludes self-reference.
BTW, the Y Combinator is a way of adding self-reference to a non-self-referential formalism. And we're debating his argument here. Deep.
- voyou 13y ago"It seems hard to prove anything interesting in a system that precludes self-reference." Indeed, isn't that one of the important features of Goedel's proof: that any system that can express basic arithmetic is capable of self-reference.
- mietek 13y agoDo you consider Planner and the actor model not to be historically important?