WOW, thanks so much for explaining it!! After reading the pdf from @27182818284 (the first letters of 'e') until chapter 2 I still didn't get anything. But now

WOW, thanks so much for explaining it!! After reading the pdf from @27182818284 (the first letters of 'e') until chapter 2 I still didn't get anything. But now I have the feel that I understand it much better. Could one improve this technique by adding more laser beams, to triangulate the location of the 'point cloud' (that's the dust, right?) more precisely. I think this could (maybe?, then) be even used to find out from which subpost a post originated. words → dust laser → ontology+semantic 3D → different semantic contexts/time I am not sure if that would work, but I am thankful to having learned something completely new.