One interesting thing to consider about the increase in Go's popularity is that it has been driven, to some extent, by programmers who really only had experienc

One interesting thing to consider about the increase in Go's popularity is that it has been driven, to some extent, by programmers who really only had experience with PHP, Ruby, or JavaScript. These are the kind of developers who have by now been burned by the inherent dangers and drawbacks of dynamic languages. They know enough to know that there must be a better way to develop safer, more reliable and better-performing software. They just aren't familiar enough with existing statically-typed compiled languages to know what's already possible. Go may just be in the right place at the right time. It is simpler than languages like C, C++, Haskell, SML, and even Scala, for example. And it is getting a lot of hype just when these dynamic language refugees need something better, and are actively looking for it. While it's good that Go offers a much better environment and infrastructure than many of these developers are accustomed to, this may also be harmful in some ways. It may be just "good enough", at least compared to the alternatives that they're familiar with, that they don't feel the need to explore more established languages which do offer much more. Even if they don't move past Go any time soon, at least it's encouraging to see them using a more responsible language for larger-scale software projects.