3 ms·
The one on lady Gaga had a point which relates to the content of my post. It was not only relevant, but interesting, as was his subsequent comment on Alcubierre
by scottlocklin 13y ago
The one on lady Gaga had a point which relates to the content of my post. It was not only relevant, but interesting, as was his subsequent comment on Alcubierre drives, which is a subject for a forthcoming post already taking shape. The dork who was attempting to "correct" my language was not interesting, and totalitarian numskulls like that deserve nothing but whatever blistering scorn I can muster at that particular moment.
The fact that this is even "a thing" with 30-odd comments about it is a sad commentary on the illness which afflicts modern civilization. If this isn't clear: I don't like people with such "refined" sensibilities, and they are invited to never, ever read my blog. If you're that sensitive, you belong by yourself in a yurt, where nobody's language or opinions will bother you.
Personally, I've never met an actual programmer of any race, gender or creed who actually is that sensitive. People that sensitive are mentally ill, and don't have jobs. I've met plenty of power-mad Cotton Mather sickos who think they have the right to police the words and opinions of others though. The fact that people think witch hunts over a fscking word are OK; that is not OK.