4 ms·
Not at all, only that it's not what people are going to think it is by looking at the title.
by michaelhoffman 13y ago
Not at all, only that it's not what people are going to think it is by looking at the title.
- danmaz74 13y agoI assumed that nobody could think that the title could be what was patented ;)
- Andrenid 13y agoAs someone not familiar with how patenting really works, that's exactly what I thought at first, and reading patents isn't exactly a clear way to understand what is "actually patented" either. In this case when I read it I understood, but sometimes reading them leaves me MORE confuses.
- throwawaykf02 13y agoStep-by-step beginner's guide to determining the scope of patents: 1. Read the claims. :-)
- axman6 13y ago2. if something doesn't make sense in the claims, you can refer to the description for clarification of what the scope of terms encompass within their scope. Also, as an ademdum to 1., specifically read the independant claims (the ones which don't mention other claims) for the definition of the broadest scope they're seeking to claim.
- motti 13y agoDan Shapiro has written a good post on this: http://www.danshapiro.com/blog/2010/09/how-to-read-a-patent-in-60-second/ http://www.danshapiro.com/blog/2010/09/how-to-read-a-patent-... To summarize, he says: 1. Skip the title 2. Skip the drawings 3. Skip the abstract 4. Skip the specification 5. Find the independent claims, and read them 6. Back to skipping – toss the dependent claims (any claim that starts with “The _____ of claim _____” is essentially a refinement or detail of the parent claim).
- jevin 13y ago2. Skip the drawings Except if they are flowcharts !