> How _dumb_ must one be to continue to trust these agencies Taking a deep breath for a moment, if you look at TFA it contains two contradicting allegations, f

> How _dumb_ must one be to continue to trust these agencies Taking a deep breath for a moment, if you look at TFA it contains two contradicting allegations, from sources that appear to me to be roughly similarly credible. On what evidentiary basis have you decided one source is more reliable than the other? And why are the people who believe the other source "lobotomized"? I am not really sure what is going on here, but I do not feel that this article alone presents a sufficient basis for a reasonable person to form an opinion.