3 ms·
What open source implementations are those? I spent some time recently learning APL, and the only one I could find was NARS2000 which is Windows-only, very bugg
by lokedhs 13y ago
What open source implementations are those? I spent some time recently learning APL, and the only one I could find was NARS2000 which is Windows-only, very buggy and has practically no documentation available.
If you know of any others, please let me know. I certainly haven't found anything.
- derekp7 13y agoThere's A+, from Morgan Stanley. It is actually a variant of APL, but it looks mostly like it (unlike J, it retains APL's hieroglyph characters, etc.) Licensed under GPL.
- No1 13y agoThe A+ website is http://www.aplusdev.org/ http://www.aplusdev.org/ for those interested.
- scottlocklin 13y agoFWIIW, I couldn't get this to build.
- derekp7 13y agoIt is also in the Fedora repositories (yum install aplus-fsf). I would imagine that it would be in Debian/Ubuntu too, but I don't have a current install to check. If all else fails, you can probably grab the source RPM to see how Fedora/Redhat got it to build.
- jk4930 13y agoThere's OpenAPL, but I've no experience with it (yet).
- beagle3 13y agohttps://github.com/kevinlawler/kona https://github.com/kevinlawler/kona is an open source implementation of K3.2 (Though note that the most recent version of K, K4, is a much cleaner and simpler language - I'm not aware of an open source version of that)