4 ms·
@DanBC I'm stepping into hot ground, but I would like to share my opinoin with you. What about the government supported public exposure of demonstrants Faces an
by X4 13y ago
@DanBC I'm stepping into hot ground, but I would like to share my opinoin with you. What about the government supported public exposure of demonstrants Faces and criminalizing every demonstrant? Isn't that the foundation of a state that prepares to do whatever it wants with it's "human ressources"? How will you know if protesters got killed when this info is censored, you even learned recently that the UK has a PRISM on it's own.
- DanBC 13y ago> you even learned recently that the UK has a PRISM on it's own. I knew that for years. I've been talking about echelon and similar for many years. > What about the government supported public exposure of demonstrants Faces If you can show me demonstrators who hide their face and who don't commit acts of criminal damage or violence I'll agree the law is stupid. > criminalizing every demonstrant? UK laws around public protest are sub-optimal, and the police do misuse many powers. People who have been wrongfully arrested, or kettled, or similar have my full support in bringing those police officers to justice. But many people demonstrate peacefully every year and have no problems with police. > How will you know if protesters got killed when this info is censored? Look at the massive amount of press coverage around people killed by police - (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713753.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713753.stm), (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13268633 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13268633) - do you honestly believe that information is or could be censored?