>“And that’s what’s been eroding over the last 20, 30 years, well before the financial crisis,” he added. Is he still blaming Bush for what are unarguably, by

>“And that’s what’s been eroding over the last 20, 30 years, well before the financial crisis,” he added. Is he still blaming Bush for what are unarguably, by this point, his problems? >The economy is “far stronger” than four years ago, he said, yet many people who write to him still do not feel secure about their future, even as their current situation recovers. It seems wants to have his cake and eat it too: "I've fixed the recession, but there's still massive unemployment." I've never understood this obsession with stock markets as economic health indicators and obscuring of unemployment by calling it "underemployment" (http://www.cnbc.com/id/100870095 http://www.cnbc.com/id/100870095).