5 ms·

I didn't say it is unethical and morally corrupt because it is illegal. It is illegal AND unethical and morally corrupt. They obviously see that it is fit to

• rms 17y ago
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism
• kiba 17y ago
  You have not addressed why is it the right of producers to make a living making despite of the fact that other men do not saw fit to patronize the producers.
  • pj 17y ago
    The consumers are in fact patronizing the producers by consuming the product the producers create. Not paying what the producer asks in exchange is the "wrong" part. The free market says that the producer can ask what it wants in exchange for the product. If the consumer doesn't want to pay it, the consumer should not consume it. Consumption without paying does not mean the consumer does not believe the product has no value. Obviously it has value if the consumer consumes it.
    • kiba 17y ago
      Patronizing required paying the producers, which did not happen. They did not found it valuable enough to pay for expensive goods. They just happens to find an unofficial illict source of goods. That's just tough luck for producer on the free market. The producers did not produce enough justification for the consumers to sponsor them. It is one thing to ask for people to pay for your product that you sold from your online store, it is quite another to demand payment on the whole supply chain of which you have no part in creating beyond being the source of the materials.(seeding, listing, describing, etc)