> he would just tell the court he had neither seen nor signed any contract If he claimed he didn't see the contract, he would be committing perjury. They woul

> he would just tell the court he had neither seen nor signed any contract If he claimed he didn't see the contract, he would be committing perjury. They wouldn't bother to forge his signature because even if both parties legitimately forget the story about the fax machine, the court would likely still find the contract enforceable. At absolute minimum, they'd have an oral contract. However, that oral contract is probably "You pay, and we'll both abide by the terms of my standard contract." Now, that's not to say that the court will find the 90 day clause enforceable. The court may decide to enforce the contract as limited by industry norms, which may be 30 days. I don't know, but he certainly won't get away with paying nothing. I should probably add, IANAL, but I'm also not just making this shit up.