5 ms·
Another thing to consider is that just because an org is a non profit, does not mean the people working there are making social worker salaries. One of my aunts
by rdouble 13y ago
Another thing to consider is that just because an org is a non profit, does not mean the people working there are making social worker salaries. One of my aunts makes over $400K/yr as an administrator at a non profit, and she's still technically on the bottom half of the management totem pole.
- muzz 13y agoThe general form of this is such an urban legend that there's even a Snopes page: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/charities.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/charities.asp
- napoleond 13y agoThat page, while refuting the specific claims of a few old chain letters, actually seems to support the parent's assertion that the executives of some charitable organisations get paid fairly well (several over $500k). Then again, I'm not sure what people expect--it is presumably difficult to retain the sort of people required to manage very large organisations without paying them something in the ballpark of what they could get at a for-profit.
- g8oz 13y agoThe salaries can also be explained by the lack of active "shareholders" to keep the self-interest of management in check. If you can't find competent managers for less than $400k a year you need to get out more. Charitynavigator.org breaks down the admin costs etc of most charities. I wouldn't consider donating to one that devoted less than 85% to actual program expenses.