It's true that compared to sports illustrated, espn is relatively text-sparse. But it's there, and in sufficient quantities. But it's not just the fact that t

It's true that compared to sports illustrated, espn is relatively text-sparse. But it's there, and in sufficient quantities. But it's not just the fact that the front page is image rich. It's that it's image crowded. Is this really the best way to present this info? Now that I think about it, when I compare espn to other news-centric sites (albeit in other fields) like politico.com and cnn.com, there are a lot of similarities. So maybe it's not necessarily just a sports related issue.