3 ms·
Ugh, those aren't buttons. Those are text inside a rectangle. :( http://monosnap.com/image/Vc05ZRQmGTmRrYvTEbLaYAI6w.png http://monosnap.com/image/Vc05ZRQmGTmR
by joevandyk 13y ago
Ugh, those aren't buttons. Those are text inside a rectangle. :(
http://monosnap.com/image/Vc05ZRQmGTmRrYvTEbLaYAI6w.png http://monosnap.com/image/Vc05ZRQmGTmRrYvTEbLaYAI6w.png -- those do not look interactive at all.
- jmduke 13y agoThat's an opinion, not a fact. If I see a colored rectangle that's offset from the text with a label that indicates action[1], I immediately think its a button. I'm willing to wager a non-trivial amount of consumers do so as well, but this is what things like context and split testing are for. [1] The trickiness with flat design is when buttons for action are also used as information display. One of the biggest issues with the first iteration of Metro was that you'd have a box that shows your current number of emails -- and you didn't know if that was just a part of your dashboard or also a link to your email that had a nice preview. That's not a failing of flat design, that's a failing of design.
- ricardobeat 13y agoI see labels. Of course context plays a huge part, but it's a gamble whether this trend will survive for long.
- skinnymuch 13y agoSort of reminds me of people saying colored text without underlines aren't links