4 ms·
Except this isn't about beliefs and opinions, but about science. You can question evolution with the scientific method if you want to. And "save the kids" seem
by Tichy 13y ago
Except this isn't about beliefs and opinions, but about science. You can question evolution with the scientific method if you want to.
And "save the kids" seems a bit more applicable when applied to teachers who are paid to educate said kids.
- pdeuchler 13y ago"Save The Kids" is an appeal to emotion and is used to avoid addressing the logic and reason of the situation. If the children are in danger then you should have no problem listing the explicit points where such actions can cause irreparable harm. Otherwise you are simply trying to shortchange the debate and prevent discourse. The way I see it, a parent has been forced to parent. While I don't have children, I remember my parents being forced to intervene with teachers on a whole host of issues. Does this mean we should ban all teachers who disagree with any parent on any issue?
- dllthomas 13y agoWhy does harm have to be irreparable to be avoided?
- Tichy 13y agoSo a teacher refusing to teach a child who doesn't believe in god, and/or a teacher teaching wrong things is not an issue in your opinion? As long as kids are locked away safely at school so that you can go about your day job things are fine? I don't understand how you can even argue that a teacher teaching wrong things could be acceptable?