4 ms·
Possibly on the plus side, increasing concentration of CO2 may be encouraging the growth of vegetation in previously bare regions. "Satellite observations reve
by davidvaughan 13y ago
Possibly on the plus side, increasing concentration of CO2 may be encouraging the growth of vegetation in previously bare regions.
"Satellite observations reveal a greening of the globe over recent decades. The role in this greening of the “CO2 fertilization” effect—the enhancement of photosynthesis due to rising CO2 levels—is yet to be established. The direct CO2 effect on vegetation should be most clearly expressed in warm, arid environments where water is the dominant limit to vegetation growth. Using gas exchange theory, we predict that the 14% increase in atmospheric CO2 (1982–2010) led to a 5 to 10% increase in green foliage cover in warm, arid environments. Satellite observations, analyzed to remove the effect of variations in precipitation, show that cover across these environments has increased by 11%. Our results confirm that the anticipated CO2 fertilization effect is occurring alongside ongoing anthropogenic perturbations to the carbon cycle and that the fertilization effect is now a significant land surface process."
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50563/abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50563/abstrac...
- motters 13y agoThe amount of CO2 being absorbed by plants is far less than the rate at which it is accumulating within the atmosphere. You can get a good idea of how much CO2 is absorbed by looking at the seasonal variation in atmospheric CO2. https://github.com/fuzzgun/ccg https://github.com/fuzzgun/ccg
- Gravityloss 13y agohttp://woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2 http://woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2 This is a better graph.
- agilebyte 13y agoWhat is the net planetary gain? Do the previously almost bare regions turn to totally bare at a slower rate?