2 ms·
Certainly not arguing that it's difficult. It's extremely trivial. It just makes no business sense for the camera manufacturer. The CCD is a generic chip tha
by mrmekon 13y ago
Certainly not arguing that it's difficult. It's extremely trivial.
It just makes no business sense for the camera manufacturer. The CCD is a generic chip that spews clocked image data over some serial connection. Keep it simple and generic, and ship to any business who wants it.
You can have a camera controller IC/ASIC/FPGA/µcontroller one step up from the CCD that manages the CCD and LEDs. That would have either firmware or hardware support for LEDs, but you'd still imagine that it would be configurable for cases where there is no LED installed.
It's absolutely possible, and I don't know all the options out there, but I can't imagine a manufacturer shipping an off-the-shelf IC that _always_ ties an LED to CCD operation.
- Arnt 13y agoSometimes companies try to act in their customer's best interest. Or at least in such a way that they don't risk customers turning away. I noticed this story on HN quite recently: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241003 http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241003 Perhaps not as often as one might wish.