4 ms·
I was disappointed that it hadn't been closed. The first answer is a backhanded dig at non-angular developers saying that angular is about architecture and impl
by benatkin 13y ago
I was disappointed that it hadn't been closed. The first answer is a backhanded dig at non-angular developers saying that angular is about architecture and implying that the others aren't.
I like angular but "angular architect" rolls off the tongue too easily.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoYou're disappointed that a really informative answer has not been closed because of some subtext you've read into it that may or may not actually be there? That doesn't seem like a very productive attitude to me.
- benatkin 13y agoAnother google employee. You're just contributing to the mutual admiration society that's all over that answer and its comments.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoThe answer was made by a Google employee? Never knew.
- benatkin 13y agoActually, no, the person who wrote the so-called "answer" which is more like an essay (and therefore not a proper Stack Overflow response) isn't a google employee. I didn't mean to imply that.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoOK, then I'm unclear on why you brought up my employer. Did it have something to do with my support of the answer in your mind? Like is Angular a Google project? Or was it just some random thing you could attack?
- benatkin 13y agoThat's funny. You rushed to Angular's defense without mentioning your financial connection and now you're annoyed that somebody else mentioned it.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoAh, that is your way of answering, "Yes, Angular is a Google project." I was not aware of that. I am not annoyed, just confused.