3 ms·
I'd say it goes deeper than that, touching on the meaning of marriage. The speaker was put in the position where he had to choose between his spouse and a talk
by femto 13y ago
I'd say it goes deeper than that, touching on the meaning of marriage. The speaker was put in the position where he had to choose between his spouse and a talk. He chose his wife, in accordance with his marriage vows. I can't see that it is sexist, as the logic doesn't change if the gender of any party is changed.
- bjornsing 13y ago> The speaker was put in the position where he had to choose between his spouse and a talk. My simple objection is that he could have had booth.