3 ms·
Its worth noting that from my quick glance, she was the only Bay Area congressperson to vote No. Incredibly disappointed
by jcdavis 13y ago
Its worth noting that from my quick glance, she was the only Bay Area congressperson to vote No. Incredibly disappointed
- _delirium 13y agoDepends on what you count as the Bay Area, but here's a tally for a sort of extended version of it: CA-2: Huffman (D), yes CA-3: Garamendi (D), yes CA-5: Thompson (D), no CA-11: Miller (D), yes CA-12: Pelosi (D), no CA-13: Lee (D), yes CA-14: Speier (D), yes CA-15: Swalwell (D), yes CA-17: Honda (D), yes CA-18: Eshoo (D), yes CA-19: Lofgren (D), yes CA-20: Farr (D), yes So 10/12 of the Bay Area voted yes, rather disproportionately in favor compared to the nationwide vote. Until putting together this list, I hadn't actually realized there are no Republicans in the entire extended Bay Area, incidentally. You have to go all the way to Modesto to find a GOP Congressman (in CA-10, where Denham voted "no").
- ajays 13y agoBecause the SF people vote her in like sheep, again and again. She knows her seat is not threatened, so she'll vote in her _own_ interests. I refuse to vote for her. I'll vote for the Republican challenger every time.
- bodyfour 13y agoOr, perhaps a little less cynically: she's the minority leader so she's expected to vote in the party's interest. When your party holds the White House that basically means supporting the administration. I don't mean this as a defense of Pelosi though. I'm also in CA-12; I usually just abstain from voting for US Rep.